the social life of early medieval canonical collections

Month: July 2026

SOLEMNE in Leeds

At this year’s International Medieval Congress in Leeds, SOLEMNE team members presented their research across multiple sessions. In session 1233, Friederike’s paper (“‘Guilty of three crimes’: Redefining Social Norms around Abortion in Early Medieval Canonical Collections?”) demonstrated how abortion carried many overlapping associations in early medieval texts, and how judicious editing by medieval canonists produced different contextualisations of the subject at both the textual and manuscript level. In session 1026, Bruno explored the intertextuality between penitentials and canonical collections in “The Fusion of Canon Law and Penitentials: Insights from the Dacheriana, De paenitentia, and Quadripartitus“. In session 806, Gideon sought to establish a timeline of the available evidence and the manuscripts related to the Sirmondian Constitutions in his paper “An Attempted Timeline for the Sirmondian Constitutions and Their Manuscripts”. In session 508 (held in memory of Jinty Nelson), Jan explored the early life of Louis the Pious, asking what we can learn about the young Louis that might shed light on the man he became. Finally, Gleb presented work undertaken with Lucie Doležalová (Univerzita Karlova, Prague) on the increasing visual complexity and compositional sophistication of book production in fifteenth-century Bohemia, in their paper “Mapping Visual Complexity in 15th-Century Manuscript Page Layouts.”

The sessions were all recorded and can be (re)viewed by those registered at https://imc-leeds.confex.com/imc/2026/meetingapp.cgi/Home/0.

For the IMC 2027, SOLEMNE is planning to organise a number of sessions reflecting on the theme of social history and early medieval normative texts. If you are interested in participating, please do not hesitate to get in touch!

Publication Gideon: ‘Did Arcadius legislate on episcopalis audientia?’

In the shadow of the 2026 International Medieval Congress at Leeds, Gideon’s latest article was published in The Legal History Review (a.k.a. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d’histoire du droit). It is a rare example of an essay about a crucial step in any research process: assessing the background of received wisdom. In this case, the assumption is that the text of CJ 1,4,7, a law on episcopal adjudication, was issued by Arcadius as part of a larger legislative action on the 27th of July AD 398 at Mnizus. Gideon’s article establishes that this is exactly that: an assumption. Through an exploration of the (lacking) manuscript evidence and earlier humanist editions of the Code, notably that of Gregorius Haloander, this article stresses both the place Mnizus and promulgation by Arcadius are in fact assumptions, without extant direct evidence. Similarly, Krüger’s claim that CJ 1,4,7 was also part of the Theodosian Code lacks direct evidence. It is a welcome reminder to all working with historical evidence mediated through (much) older scholarship.

Gideon de Jong, ‘Did Arcadius legislate on episcopalis audientia? And was that legislation included in the Theodosian Code?’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d’histoire du droit / The Legal History Review 94(1-2) (2026), pp. 138-181. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20260110

 

© 2026 Canones

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑